Major columnist legitimizes theory of Obama plot to destroy U.S.
Monday, 9 November 2009
From the very start of Barack Obama's rather odd, meteoric rise to prominence in American politics, many of us on the conservative side voiced our suspicions that something subversive was under way.
Too many strange coincidences, many troublesome alliances, too much hype in too short a period of time all pointed to many hidden, concerted, coordinated effort to get this man into the White House in short order.
We alerted you to the views of Obama's admitted mentors--such as Saul Alinsky, the 1960s radical who worked to destroy capitalism as well as America's form of government, and William Ayers, whose underground movement in the late 60s and 70s bombed federal buildings and vowed to murder those who staunchly defended the American way of life.
Both of these strong influences on Obama adhered to the Cloward-Piven strategy, developed by 2 radical university professors in the 60s, which advocated deliberately overloading the United States social and economic system so that the entire thing would crash under the weight. By deliberately causing such a crash, a new order could be built in America based upon pure Marxism.
Then, once in office, low and behold Obama begins to load up his administration with self-avowed Communists, Marxists, and different radicals who not only adhere to the views espoused by Alinsky and the Cloward-Piven strategy but who believe that Communist dictators e.g. Hugo Chavez in Venezuela make good role models for what should occur in America.
We have discussed this at length in previous columns on Vann Jones, Mark Lloyd, Cass Sunstein, Valerie Jarrett, and many other 'czars' and political advisers with whom Obama has surrounded himself.
All of this, of course, has been summarily dismissed by those in the mainstream as 'fear-mongering,' 'the ranting of right-wing nutcases,' or 'paranoia.'
Such knee-jerk reactions to reasonable observations based on factual evidence might be about to change.
National syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer, who has never been regarded as a true conservative but as a 'neo-con' as the liberals like to call it, now says that such suspicions concerning Obama's true motives may be right.
To be sure, Krauthammer has never been one to engage in speculative conspiracy-theory mongering. His columns appear in 'mainstream' newspapers all across America. And on the night that Barack Obama won the White House, he commented on Fox News that may be given the choices that we had, Obama was the best one for the job.
Circumstances have clearly changed, at least in Krauthammer's view. The columnist now believes that Obama's ultimate goal is to finally bring about the scenario envisioned by the Cloward-Piven strategy--a complete collapse of the American economic system at which time the 'ruling elites' can start over and rebuild America based upon a radical agenda as envisioned by his mentors such as Saul Alinsky.
The method by which Obama would bring this about is gradually coming into sharp focus.
An economic strategy has been launched that will ultimately bring stagnation to the U.S. economy, similar to that from which European countries have suffered for decades, leading to a devaluing of the dollar. This, in fact, is already happening. The dollar is now practically worthless, and other nations are calling for a different world-currency to substitute the dollar.
Once the dollar is devalued and the economy is stagnant, America can no longer be THE world power that it is today, forcing us to essentially withdraw as the major voice for liberty in the world and drastically scale back our military forces and weapons arsenals.
It is then that the radical Marxists will have the money to implement European-styled Socialism, or worse. This, of course, would involve spending mind-boggling amounts of money to build a cradle-to-the-grave nanny-state, along with all of the various restrictions and limitations on human behavior that such a system entails.
No longer would the U.S. Constitution be viewed as the final authority on matters of law and rights but as merely a foundational document which is no longer relevant. Instead of adhering to a rule of law that places severe restrictions on government, we would then develop a 'declaration of human rights' of sorts, that includes such things as 'the right to healthcare,' which by nature means that government is required to confiscate funds from citizens in order to provide.
Anytime another citizen is forced by government to pay for many supposed 'right' that somebody else claims they have, then it immediately ceases to be a right. It is then a mandate, and we are at that point nothing more than slaves to government.
And lest you view this as the paranoid musings of a rightwing nutjob, remember that Obama's closest friends, allies, and supporters all admit that this is their ultimate vision for America.
Be sure to read all of Krauthammer's article. It is an eye-opener.
And keep in mind that the more of this stuff the citizens find out, the more we are determined to fight for our liberties and to oust the charlatans from office.
0 comments:
Post a Comment